Life of a gaander...

Random pics, thoughts, links, and posts of interest.... 
Filed under

veg

 

Looking for something good to eat? Here are 29 healthy snack options...

SS: I like how they break them down by type of snack as we definitely have our moods for what we want when (salty vs. sweet, etc.)...

Snack Healthy-29 Smart Snack Options

Snacking is not a bad thing. In fact, if you find yourself craving “something” at 3 o’clock or after dinner, you should take the time to really figure out what that “something” is. You body is sending you signals all the time, and it’s your job to listen to them. Wanting or craving snacks is sometimes your body’s way of telling you that it is not completely satisfied or balanced. Maybe your lunch was too salty so you find yourself craving something sweet. Maybe you have been eating too many creamy foods, like yogurt and smoothies and your body and brain really wants something crunchy. Maybe your blood sugar has dropped because you skipped breakfast.

Snacking smartly can help diminish your cravings in a healthy way, help restore balance and help to simply put you in a good mood. By choosing a healthy snack that you actually enjoy you can help with your concentration, brain function and ward off that irritability that may be on its way. So when that next craving hits, ask yourself, “What am I really in the mood for”? Here are some healthy snack options ideas, broken down into categories, crunchy, sweat, salty and creamy, from The Institute of Integrative Nutrition.

CRUNCHY:

  • apples
  • rice cakes
  • 1 or 2 hard pretzels: the large Bavarian variety
  • crunchy crudités of veggies and dip (hummus or your favorite low sugar dressing)
  • celery and organic nut butter
  • small portion of nuts

SWEET:

  • fresh, whole fruit
  • organic Greek yogurt and ripe fruit
  • apples and almond butter
  • sprouted bread with jam
  • dried fruit
  • smoothies-Fresh or frozen fruit, Soy, Almond or favorite Milk, dash of agave and ice
  • sweet vegetables: yams, sweet potatoes, squashes (acorn, butternut, kabocha) cut into chunks; sprinkle with cinnamon and bake
  • Goji berries

SALTY:

  • olives
  • pickles, and pickled vegetables, such as carrot, daikon, beets, or lotus root
  • tabouli
  • tortilla chips and salsa or guacamole: try whole grain chips such as “Garden of Eatin” brand and freshly made salsa or guacamole
  • sauerkraut
  • salted edamame

CREAMY:

  • smoothies
  • Greek yogurt
  • avocados
  • rice pudding
  • dips and spreads, like hummus and baba ghanoush
  • pureed soups
  • puddings made with silken tofu, avocado, or mashed banana
  • mashed sweet potatoes
  • coconut milk

*Be sure to listen to your body, deconstruct your craving, measure out portion sizes, and be mindful. Don’t forget to chew thoroughly and enjoy.

Photo Credit: ChrisVanDyck at Flickr for Creative Commons

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Health   Veg  

Comments [0]

Scary fact...You're Always At Most 107 Mi From A McDonald's

You're Always At Most 107 Miles From A McDonald's [Infographics]

Stephen Von Worley has figured out that while located in these United States of America, one is always within 107 miles of a McDonald's.

He also created this nifty map to illustrate the concept. According to Mr. Von Worley, "Between the tiny Dakotan hamlets of Meadow and Glad Valley lies the McFarthest Spot: 107 miles distant from the nearest McDonald's, as the crow flies, and 145 miles by car!"

That's quite a drive.

Where The Buffalo Roamed [Weather Sealed via Buzzfeed]



Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Green   Veg  

Comments [0]

Moët is Murder, a photo essay...

Moët is Murder (or "Where Wine Comes From") on Flickr - Photo Sharing!

Moët is Murder (or "Where Wine Comes From") by bitrot.

via

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Fun   Veg  

Comments [1]

NFL star Tony Gonzalez talks about his vegan-inspired diet

Tony Gonzalez credits his diet for keeping him on the top of his game as he looks to make his 11th straight Pro Bowl in his first season with the Atlanta Falcons.
By Jeff Roberson, AP
Tony Gonzalez credits his diet for keeping him on the top of his game as he looks to make his 11th straight Pro Bowl in his first season with the Atlanta Falcons.

FLOWERY BRANCH, Ga. — Tony Gonzalez swears he has found a personal fountain of youth, and that it explains how he has so majestically defied pro football's hourglass.

It's on the menu.

Gonzalez, 33, enters his 13th season as the NFL's longest-tenured starting tight end, with no apparent signs of disintegration. Nearing the 200-game milestone, he still has soft hands. His feet remain quick enough to pivot free in the red zone. And as demonstrated during a congested-traffic, 11-on-11 goal-line drill in the Atlanta Falcons camp, he has not lost the knack for making the paydirt catch while two defenders cling tight like parasites.

He's working on a streak of 10 consecutive Pro Bowl selections and last season was named first-team all-pro — significantly enough, for the first time in five years.

This, he insists, emanates from a decision three years ago to adopt Vegan principles for his diet.

"It's clean eating, from a 100% grass-fed source," says Gonzalez, obtained in April from the Kansas City Chiefs for a second-round pick.

 

"You have to put good stuff in your body. Everybody should, but especially athletes. We're high-performance machines. You wouldn't put regular gas in a race car. Jimmie Johnson is going to put the high-octane, good stuff in there. It's the same thing for football players. You'd be surprised by how many players don't do it. But I've seen the results."

Before: Fast food. TV dinners. Bacon cheeseburgers. Potato chips. Soda.

After: Seafood. Steamed vegetables. Rice. Salads with Balsamic vinegarette.

Because he eats fish and occasionally has organic chicken, Gonzalez isn't a true vegetarian. He's a flexitarian who views vegetables as the main course. He says he often cooks for his family, because, well, his wife Tobie is "quasi on-board."

"She's having trouble," Gonzalez says. "When I cook, she's eating good. But if she has to do it on her own, she might not make the best choices."

Gonzalez has become so hooked on his lifestyle change that he collaborated with nutritionist Mitzi Dulan on a new book, The All-Pro Diet. Recipes included.

"If you don't want to read my book, fine," says Gonzalez, who also recommends a documentary, Food, Inc. "But I encourage everybody to get something that tells you how nutrition affects your body. Try it and see how it feels."

Family history has played a role in his evolution. Gonzalez says that an uncle and some cousins have Type 2 diabetes.

"It's really rampant among minorities," Gonzalez says. "And if you're of a lesser income, it's harder to eat healthy, which is sad. That's another thing I can see myself trying to change ... The stores don't care about what we eat. They just want to make money. It's really up to us as people to wake up."

The turning point for Gonzalez began during a cross-country flight about three years ago, he says, as he sat next to a vegan. After observing the man's meal, Gonzalez peppered him with questions. The conversation led him to read The China Study and ultimately speak to its author, Dr. T. Colin Campbell, about theories of a plant-based diet increasing energy and reducing risks for illness such as heart disease, diabetes and cancer.

Two other incidents in 2006 also shook him up. After feeling numbness on the right side of his face, Gonzalez was diagnosed with Bell's Palsy, a form of facial paralysis stemming from nerve malfunction. After receiving treatment, he hasn't had any recurring symptoms. A mixup with a blood test, later rectified, also hit home.

"I laugh about it now," he says, "but it was one of the scariest moments in my life when they told me, 'Your white blood cell count is way too low. Could be leukemia, but we don't want to startle you.' By then, you're like, 'What the hell are you talking about?'

"That was the defining moment. You hear all the statistics out there about the mortaility rate for football players. Life is too short."

No tight end has ever been to as many Pro Bowls as Gonzalez (6-5, 243), but the past two seasons he produced some of his best numbers with 99 and 96 receptions, while surpassing one NFL marker after another (most career catches, yards, TDs, 1,000-yard seasons by a tight end). In his view, it gets back to the diet.

"I've seen the difference on the field and noticed it after the game," he says. "My recovery is way better. My endurance is better. My focus has improved. Before I drastically changed my eating habits, I was sore. My bones were hurting. But not anymore."

The Falcons, trying to build on last season's 11-5 record and playoff berth, envision Gonzalez as an ultimate security blanket for young quarterback Matt Ryan. He will stretch the middle of the field and provide a trusted option in the end zone.

"Even before I got here, I always thought I'd love to get that quintessential all-pro tight end," says Falcons GM Thomas Dimitroff, like coach Mike Smith in his second year on the job. "You can talk to some coordinators in this league and they say you need to go all wideouts. But a guy like this is special, a high-percentage shot underneath."

They've also acquired a resident nutritionist.

During training camp meals, Gonzalez says some teammates cover their plates when they see him coming. But at least one, backup tight end Ben Hartsock, is inspired.

"I've watched him eat, and he's pretty serious about it," Hartsock says. "But if Tony sipped Crisco through a straw, he'd still look as good as he does. His genetics and my genetics come from a different tree."

Hartsock, a sixth-year pro, was undoubtedly affected by Gonzalez's arrival. He lost his starting job. But there are no hard feelings.

"You just adjust to your role," Hartsock says. "If I were in the front office or the head coach and had an opportunity to get a future Hall of Fame talent like Tony Gonzalez, I'd do the exact same thing. We're a better team with him."

Gonzalez is staying in a suite with Ryan and veterans Chris Redman and Brian Finneran during camp. He says it has been a solid bonding experience, and there are times when football doesn't enter the conversation.

But food is fair game.

Is Ryan, a second-year pro, ready to become a vegan?

"Nah, he's not doing it," Gonzalez says. "He told me he wasn't doing it until he's older. He says he's young; he can burn it off and not feel it.

"I'm like, 'You'd better, or you'll be out of the league.' "

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Sports   Veg  

Comments [0]

If pets are so protected from abuse, why not farm animals??

On the Farm

Aug 26 2009, 8:35 am

Looking Out For All Animals

nimans_august26_cows_post.jpg

Photo by law_keven/Flickr CC


Most people know NFL quarterback Michael Vick jeopardized his career and went to prison for violating animal cruelty laws. What they likely don't realize is that unlike dogs and other pets, farm animals are virtually unprotected against cruelty, no matter how extreme. While every state in the country has animal anti-cruelty statutes on the books, most explicitly exempt farm animals. We think that should change.

As just one example, consider the following. Today the shareholders of Smithfield Foods, the country's largest pork company, will gather for their annual meeting. Smithfield has been one of the most important players in hog farming's industrialization, controlling the lives and deaths of over 30 million pigs in the United States every year. This means the company also has tremendous capacity to improve the lives of animals raised for food.

All of the pigs raised for Smithfield's pork spend their entire lives in metal buildings. The vast majority of their breeding females are even more severely constrained, being kept in narrow metal cages that are only slightly larger than their bodies (called gestation crates), a practice that has been banned in the European Union because of the suffering it causes sows.

This illustrates the problem with voluntary measures to improve animal welfare. There's nothing to prevent companies from abandoning them when they become inconvenient.
Recognizing a growing unease about the conditions in industrialized farms in the United States, Smithfield announced with fanfare in 2007 that it would be phasing out the use of gestation crates for its sows. Shortly thereafter, Nicolette wrote an essay in the New York Times arguing that the company was not going far enough. But now it turns out that Smithfield won't even be getting rid of gestation crates.

In the Smithfield shareholder notice for its upcoming annual meeting, it included the following statement, indicating that it will not make good on its commitment to do away with gestation crates:

Due to recent significant operating losses incurred by our Hog Production segment, we have delayed capital expenditures for the program such that we no longer expect to complete the phase-out within ten years of the original announcement.
This illustrates the problem with voluntary measures to improve animal welfare. There's nothing that deters agribusiness companies from abandoning them when they become inconvenient.

Agricultural trade associations have long asserted that animal welfare laws are a bad idea because farmers and ranchers know best how to take care of their animals. We heartily agree. In our experience, the people who work with farm animals every day have the best sense of what is needed to ensure their welfare and the knowledge of how welfare can be protected in practice. But good animal husbandry is literally impossible in industrial set-ups.

In addition to the ubiquitous use of gestation crates, pigs in confinement buildings are never given any bedding to lie down on. Straw or other bedding is impossible because it would gum up the works of the confinement building's sewage flushing system. Animals are forced to stand and lie on concrete or grated metal flooring for their entire lives. The same is true for egg-laying hens, who are typically confined to cages so small they cannot stretch their wings.

The benefit of laws is that they create a level playing field for all farmers and ranchers. If everyone must operate under the same rules, farmers who want to provide good conditions for their animals are not put at an economic disadvantage for doing it. That's the main advantage of mandates. In fact, when the feeding of antibiotics was outlawed in Sweden in 1986, it was at the behest of the meat industry itself for precisely this reason. Similarly, we've talked with cattle ranchers who've said they wish the government would ban growth hormones for cattle because then they could afford to stop using them. If no one is allowed to do it, no one gets an upper hand from the practice.

Recently, Nicolette spoke with David Favre, a professor at Michigan State University Law School who specializes in animal law. "Farm animals need enhanced legal protection as their life conditions--their welfare--are governed by the economic pressures of the marketplace, and neither the federal law nor the state anti-cruelty laws protect them from exploitation," Favre said. "Cheaper and more 'efficient' production means less and less concern for the animals' welfare. Because of the political power of the industrial agriculture lobby it is very difficult to obtain laws that simply respect their lives, lives that they will soon give up to become human food."

Although Nicolette is a lawyer with an accompanying affection for law, we both dislike the idea of burdening America's farmers with additional laws or regulations. The profession is hard enough as it is. But the complete absence of oversight of farm animal husbandry practices has led to some extreme practices becoming commonplace, like the continual caging of hens, crating of sows, and tethering of veal calves in such a way that they can literally barely move for their entire lives.

We strongly supported laws in Florida, Arizona, California, and Colorado that outlawed some of these practices. And we favor a national farm animal welfare law like the one introduced by former Congressman Christopher Shays in the 109th Congress. We hope someone in Congress will show the courage to pick up where he left off.

Thought the article makes an interesting point....

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Progressive   Society   Veg  

Comments [0]

Onion news network delves into PETAs unethical treatment of women....

This is hilarious....describes PETA's unethical treatment of women....shout out to Gabriel for sending this link

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Fun   Veg  

Comments [0]

The wrong way to promote vegetarianism...

I'm all about being vegetarian, but this is the wrong way to go about it...

Keepin’ It Classy: PETA Compares Fat Women to Whales

Often when we have an image related to PETA we add it to one of our existing posts, since they tend to be similar–mostly sexualizing women or showing them as bloody meat. But Jessica B. told me about a PETA billboard that takes a different angle, and I thought it was worth its very own post:


s-SAVE-THE-WHALES-large


Found at The Huffington Post.


This is just…ugh. Erg. !!! ??? !!!


I’m sorry, but that’s the most coherent I can be about this. I’m sure our commenters will be able to make more useful points about it.


Well, ok, I have one more thought: the implication is that being a vegetarian will automatically make you lose weight. That’s just dumb, or more likely intentionally misleading.


Related posts: women in (fake) lettuce bikinis, Dutch animal rights ad shows stripper brutally murdered, not sexualizing older women, PETA ad banned from Superbowl, women as bloody packaged meat, Holocaust on Your Plate campaign, using domestic violence to oppose animal abuse, Christina Applegate naked, more naked celebrities, and leftist balkanization.



Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Veg  

Comments [2]

Want to watch the movie Food Inc. as I've heard good things...anyone seen it yet?

Food, Inc. Is a Must-See Movie

http://www.thedailygreen.com/healthy-eating/blogs/healthy-food/food-inc-movie-44030501
I talked my way into a press screening of Food, Inc. last night. Good thing. This film is the riveting documentary directed by Robert Kenner due for release soon but already generating lots of buzz, and for good reason. It's a terrific introduction to the way our food system works and to the effects of this system on the health of anyone who eats, as well as of farm workers, farm animals, and the planet. It stars Eric Schlosser and Michael Pollan, among others, but I was especially moved by Barbara Kowalcyk, the eloquent and forceful food safety advocate who lost a young son to E. coli O17:H7 some years ago. I can't wait for the film to come out so everyone can see it. I will use it in classes, not least because it's such an inspiring call to action. Here's the trailer:

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Green   Progressive   Veg  

Comments [0]

LA peeps, great website for conscious living - YDT


Your Daily Thread is a cool Southern California site for all things green, sustainable and local...

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Green   Veg  

Comments [0]

Will our environment soon "force" us to become vegetarian?

A very interesting and provocative article....it's really interesting to think about the connection between the "green" and vegetarian movements - can one who truly considers themselves green really be a non-vegetarian considering the environmental toll it takes on the globe???

How the coming vegetarian revolution will arrive by force.

By Jim Motavalli

I have a prediction: Sooner than you might think, this will be a vegetarian world. Future generations will find the idea of eating meat both morally absurd and logistically impossible. Of course, one need only look at the booming meat industry, the climbing rates of meat consumption in the developing world, and the menu of just about any restaurant to call me crazy. But already, most people know that eating red meat is bad for their health and harmful for the planet. It's getting them to actually change their diet that's the hard part -- and that's exactly why it won't happen by choice.

Going by the numbers, eating meat is pretty hard to justify for the even moderately health-conscious. A National Cancer Institute report released last March found that people who ate the most red meat were, as the New York Times put it, "most likely to die from cancer, heart disease and other causes." The biggest abstainers "were least likely to die."  Those who eat five ounces of meat daily, (the equivalent of one and a half Quarter Pounders or Big Macs) increase their risk from cancer or heart disease by 30 percent compared to those who eat two-thirds of an ounce daily -- a stark difference.

The environmental impact is also crystal clear -- and similarly appalling. "Livestock's Long Shadow," a 2006 report by the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organzation (FAO), found that livestock is a major player in climate change, accounting for 18 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions (measured in carbon dioxide equivalents), or more than the entire global transportation system.

The obvious solution to both health and environmental disasters is to stop eating meat altogether. But this is easier said than done. Even the studies addressing the impact of meat on the planet downplay vegetarianism, as if the authors are nervous to press it on people. Going veggie is not even proposed as one of the FAO's "mitigation options" (which instead include conservation tillage, organic farming, and better nutrition for livestock to reduce methane gas production). Nor is it emphasized in "Happier Meals: Rethinking the Global Meat Industry," a report by Danielle Nierenberg at the Worldwatch Institute. The study's author is herself a vegan, but she told me, "Food choices are a very personal decision for most people. We are only now convincing them that this is a tool at their disposal if they care about the environment."

She has a point: Giving up meat is tough, and arguing people into it is probably a losing proposition. Even with all the statistics out there about the dangers of meat, there are fewer vegetarians in the world than you'd think. A Harris poll conducted in 2006 for the Vegetarian Resource Group found that only 2.3 percent of American adults 18 or older claim never to eat meat, fish, or fowl. A larger group, 6.7 percent, say they "never eat meat," but often that means they only avoid the red kind. Worldwide, local vegetarian societies report high participation in just a few places - for example, 40 percent in India, 10 percent in Italy, 9 percent in Germany, 8.5. percent in Israel, and 6 percent in Britain.

So how will we become a vegetarian planet? The numbers suggest that we won't stop eating meat simply because it's "the right thing to do." People love it too much. Instead, we'll be forced to stop. By 2025, we simply won't have the resources to keep up the habit. According to the FAO report, 33 percent of the world's arable land is devoted to growing crops for animal feed, and grazing is a major factor in deforestation around the world. It's also incredibly water-intensive. The average U.S. diet requires twice the daily amount of water as does an equally nutritious vegetarian diet, reports the Worldwatch Institute. Meanwhile, there will be more than 8 billion people on this earth, and two-thirds of the world's population will live in water-stressed regions.

Sounds like a mess -- and one that doesn't bode well for our cattle cravings. Meat will disappear -- except as a luxury available to few -- and the ethical issues will evolve, too. In the way that slavery, once a broad social norm, later became an unthinkable crime, we can expect to see a similar shift once meat-eating disappears from our planet. Perhaps, some day, the very idea of eating animal flesh will seem as remote as the idea of owning humans does now. So if you're a carnivore, enjoy now -- before the inevitable vegetarian revolution begins.

Jim Motavalli is a senior writer at E/The Environmental Magazine and blogs for the Mother Nature Network.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Green   Veg  

Comments [0]